EVALUATION OF LASER CUTTING CONDITIONS USING THE
Authors:
Abstract: Selecting the most suitable laser cutting parameters for a specific application is challenging, as it requires balancing numerous techno-technological, quality, productivity, and economic criteria. In this study, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model was developed to evaluate laser cutting conditions. Experimental data in fiber laser cutting of S235JR steel, obtained from a 22 factorial design, were used to define four alternative cutting conditions. Evaluation and ranking of these alternatives were carried out using the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method, considering cut perpendicularity, surface roughness, surface productivity, dimensional deviation, and angular deviation as evaluation criteria. The relative importance of these criteria was determined using an analytic hierarchy process (AHP), through a pair-wise comparison matrix and the geometric mean method. The stability of the final ranking was examined with respect to variations in the linear combination coefficient. By analysing the quasilinear model for prediction of the total relative importance of alternatives, it was revealed that the focus position has the utmost importance, followed by the interaction effect of focus position and cutting speed.
Keywords: fiber laser cutting, decision making, S235JR steel, WASPAS, cutting regimes
Pages: 244-274
REFERENCES:
1. Cepauskaite, L., Bendikiene, R., 2024, Effect of Fiber-Laser Parameters on Cutting Accuracy of Thin and Thick S355JR Structural Steel Plates, Metals, 14(6), Article ID: 723, 26 pages.
2. Wandera, C., 2016, Fiber Lasers in Material Processing, in Paul, M.C., Ed., Fiber Laser, IntechOpen, London, 440 p.
3. Powell, J., Kaplan, A.F.H., 2012, A technical and commercial comparison of fiber laser and CO2 laser cutting, Proc. 31st International Congress on Laser Materials Processing, Laser Microprocessing and Nanomanufacturing ICALEO 2012, Anaheim, pp. 277-281.
4. Alsaadawy, M., Dewidar, M., Said, A., Maher, I., Shehabeldeen, T.A., 2024, A comprehensive review of studying the influence of laser cutting parameters on surface and kerf quality of metals, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 130(3-4), pp. 1039-1074.
5. Adin, M.Ş., 2024, Experimental research of the influence of fiber laser machining parameters on HAZ width in AISI 4140 steels, Dicle University Journal of Engineering, 15(4), pp. 873-880.
6. Basar G, Der O., 2025, Multi-objective optimization of process parameters for laser cutting polyethylene using fuzzy AHP-based MCDM methods, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 239(4), pp. 2295-2309.
7. Der, O., Başar, G., 2025, TOPSIS-based multi-response optimization for improving CO2 laser cutting quality of 3D printed PLA, International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, 9(2), pp. 118-129.
8. Der, O., Ordu, M., Başar, G., 2024, Multi-Objective Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Polyethylene Thermoplastic Material by Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis and SWARA-Based CoCoSo Approach, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 7(2), pp. 638-661.
9. Khalaf, T., Thangaraj, M., Moiduddin, K., 2023, Performance Evaluation and MOORA Based Optimization of Pulse Width Control on Leather Specimens in Diode Laser Beam Cutting Process, Processes, 11(10), Article ID: 2901, 19 pages.
10. Srinivasan, D., Ramakrishnan, H., Balasundaram, R., Ravichandran, M., 2023, Optimization of laser cutting process parameters on Ss347 using GRA and TOPSIS, Surface Review and Letters, 30(6), Article ID: 2350039, 13 pages.
11. Trifunović, M., Madić, M., Petrović, G., Marinković, D., Janković, P., 2025, Fuzzy MCDM Methodology for Analysis of Fibre Laser Cutting Process, Applied Sciences, 15(13), Article ID: 7364, 16 pages.
12. Das, P.P., Chakraborty, S., 2020, Application of Superiority and Inferiority Multi-criteria Ranking Method for Parametric Optimization of Laser Cutting Processes, Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 4(4), pp. 409-427.
13. Lukic, D., Cep, R., Milosevic, M., Antic, A., Zivkovic, A., Todic, V., Rodic, D., 2022, A Grey Fuzzy Approach to the Selection of Cutting Process from the Aspect of Technological Parameters, Applied Sciences, 12(24), Article ID: 12589, 16 pages.
14. Khan, A., Maity, K.P., 2016, Application of MCDM-Based TOPSIS Method for the Optimization of Multi Quality Characteristics of Modern Manufacturing Processes, International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 23, pp. 33-51.
15. Saaty, T.L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 287 p.
16. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., Zakarevicius, A., 2012, Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment, Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, 122(6), pp. 3-6.
17. Madić, M., Nedić, B., Radovanović, M., 2015, Business and engineering decision-making using multi-criteria analysis methods (in Serbian), University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Engineering, Kragujevac, 186 p.
English (UK)
Srpski-latinica
Српски-ћирилица 
